Difference is More Active Cooperation Jewelry Retouching

Description of your first forum.
Post Reply
jannatara0801
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2022 4:16 am

Difference is More Active Cooperation Jewelry Retouching

Post by jannatara0801 »

The Biden administration's China policy since taking office has not only continued Trump's approach, but also raised relevant sanctions on some issues. For example, the number of homes that prohibit Americans from investing in Chinese military enterprises has increased, and Chinese enterprises and institutions suspected of human rights in Xinjiang have been included in the list of export control entities on many occasions.The relevant China-related bills currently under consideration by both the Senate and the House of Representatives, whether it is the "2021 American Innovation and Competition Act" in the Senate or the "Eagle Act" under consideration in the House of Representatives, fully echo Biden's push for a comprehensive China-China relationship. The policy axis of strategic competition. It once again shows that the consistent position of the United States on China, regardless of political parties and government departments, will not be shaken in the short term. The legislative move of both houses of the United States has caused China to have a very serious misjudgment of the actions of the Biden administration. The most critical thing is that the United States actively cooperates with allies, which is the biggest difference between the Biden administration and the previous administration's policy toward China.While resolving the long-term bilateral disputes with the EU, the Biden administration issued a statement on China's non-market economy, and also issued a US-EU cooperation confrontation on occasions such as the US-EU WTO aircraft subsidy dispute and the resolution of the 232 steel and aluminum tax dispute. In the case of China's unfair competition, the joint position of the United States and Europe in ChinaJewelry Retouching has also become strategically clear.In addition, the United States has received the response and input of India, Japan and Australia in the "Quad Conference" (QUAD) in the Indo-Pacific region, and has also introduced European forces such as the European Union to participate in the activities in the Indo-Pacific region, which has become the foundation of the United States' strategy toward China solid backing. Image The trade war continues: the US-China tariff war will not end in the short term Since President Trump imposed punitive tariffs on Chinese goods in 2018, the average tariff has increased from 3.1% to 19.3%, which has led to an increase in the price of US retail products. Therefore, the US Section 301 tariff is considered to be a lose-lose for US companies and US consumers. wrong action. Furthermore, after the 301 measures were imposed, the problem of the trade deficit between the United States and China has not been clearly resolved.Therefore, in early August this year, the US-China Business Council, led by the US-China Business Council, issued a joint letter with 33 representative organizations of the US business community, urging the US government to cancel the tariffs imposed by the US-China Section 301 measure.However, from Katherine Tai’s CSIS talk in October, she said that the procedure for US companies to apply for 301 tariff exemptions was restarted, and she also announced relevant policies immediately, which implied that even if the Biden administration faced the pressure of a strong domestic industry, the 301 tariffs The measures will remain in place for at least some time.
Post Reply